Thursday, May 31, 2012

FOXNews.com: New ultrasound toothbrush could revolutionize oral hygiene

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
New ultrasound toothbrush could revolutionize oral hygiene
May 31st 2012, 19:37

More than 75 percent of American adults have some form of gum disease – but the condition is completely preventable.

Peer Blumenschein, CEO of Emmi-Tech, Inc., recently spoke with Fox News Health about a new technology that is changing the way we brush our teeth – the Emmi-Dent Ultrasonic Toothbrush.

"[It's] a new device in the United States," Blumenschein said, "…and it's the first toothbrush which runs 100 percent on ultrasound, so the ultrasound cleans.  You do not have to brush – so it's a 'no brushing' toothbrush."

The toothbrush – modeled after the average dental teeth cleaning - uses devices with ultrasonic power to break down tartar.  But unlike conventional cleanings, the Emmi-Dent brush utilizes microwaves with significantly less power.

"[It's] just enough to kill the bacteria in your mouth – in your gums, on the teeth – so that you don't destroy the teeth or the enamel and basically don't harm your oral system," Blumenschein said.

According to Blumenschein, the Emmi-Dent brush is superior to other run-of-the-mill toothbrushes, because it is much more thorough.  He said that brushes with bristles are only scraping away bacteria, but some of the bacteria resides on the brush and aren't completely gone.

"With the ultrasound, you have so much energy that is basically destroying the membranes of the bacteria," Blumenschein, "and therefore they are completely destroyed and disappear…into thousands of small pieces."

The brush's technique has been confirmed by numerous European studies, and Blumenschein said the company has received nothing but positive feedback from dentists. Patients with other more extreme oral hygiene problems have also shown to benefit from using the brush, by reducing inflammation, bad breath and teeth stains.

Blumenschein maintains that no adverse side effects to using the Emmi-Dent brush have been found.

To learn more about Emmi-Dent, visit http://www.emmi-dent.com/.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Ten thousand year old tartar holds clues to ancient human diet

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ten thousand year old tartar holds clues to ancient human diet
May 31st 2012, 19:09

Many ancient human teeth, including specimens tens of thousands of years old, still hold onto tiny pieces of food -- and even bacteria. Anthropologists are studying the tartar attached to ancient human teeth to learn more about the plants people ate and the pathogens they carried long ago.

Tartar, also known as dental calculus, is a hard substance that toothpaste ads promise to obliterate and dentists scrape away. It builds up on human teeth after dental plaque solidifies. A dentist might scrape away 30 milligrams of a patient's calculus each visit. Sets of teeth from hundreds or thousands of years ago might have up to 20 times that much, a mass roughly equal to a small paperclip.

Scientists are only beginning to explore the variety of materials caught in calculus, which preserves organic materials that are often fleetingly preserved in other settings. This allows scientists to address questions that are very difficult to answer using established archaeological methods.

'We have theories about what they ate but we really have no idea.'

- Physical anthropologist Amanda Henry

"There are so many time periods in human history where we have theories about what they ate but we really have no idea," said Amanda Henry, a physical anthropologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, in Leipzig, Germany.

Seeds and grains often degrade slowly and animal bones typically last even longer. But finding direct evidence of vegetable consumption is more difficult. Vegetables such as cabbage and carrots were important foods in medieval Europe, but evidence to confirm their consumption is hard to come by. Reconstructing the full diet for people living in earlier periods is even more difficult.

"We know very little about the vegetable and salad portion of the diet," said Christina Warinner, an archaeological geneticist at University of Zurich's Centre for Evolutionary Medicine, in Switzerland. "[Studying calculus] could potentially be an entirely new way of approaching that."

Small Fossils, Big Information

Calculus contains pollen grains and microscopic fossilized plant pieces called phytoliths, in addition to starch grains and even bacteria. Fragments of bacterial DNA found in calculus can help identify specific pathogens that were once present in the mouths of ancient people.

The plant evidence can be definitive enough to suggest the species that was consumed, or it may suggest what part of a plant was eaten, such as a fruit or leaf. This can help track the use, spread and evolution of food plants, including agricultural varieties, through time and space.

Researchers can examine the calculus directly on the tooth with a microscope. But for further analysis, they carefully scrape the material off ancient teeth with common dental tools to avoid contaminating the samples with modern material. From that scraped-off tartar, they then carefully remove non-organic material to concentrate the food remnants.

Scientists use microscopes and molecular methods to examine the samples. Examining the small bits of food they find is challenging some long-held beliefs about ancient peoples and helping to answer significant questions.

Henry has been studying Neanderthal diet and working to confirm her initial results that they ate plants regularly. Some researchers have long argued that Neanderthals were primarily carnivores who depended on meat and fat.

"We were able to show that [Neanderthals] did eat plant foods and they processed these foods," said Henry. "It's the first time we have evidence of what those plant foods are."

Henry and her collaborators identified grass seeds, tubers that may have been related to water lilies, and at least in a location in present-day Iraq, the foods had been cooked.

Jaime Pagan-Jimenez, a Puerto Rico-based anthropologist working at Leiden University in the Netherlands, recently began analyzing calculus to obtain more evidence in his study of diets throughout the Caribbean islands.

Pagan-Jimenez had already studied starch grains found in artifacts used to process and cook foods, concluding that the people who first lived on the Caribbean islands were, in at least many cases, cultivating a variety of food plants, such as corn, sweet potato, beans, and more. His findings also challenged the idea that the area's main food crop was manioc, a root also known as cassava or yucca. The new technique allows him to confirm what foods actually reached the mouth.

"We had the chance of seeing directly in the human tooth what plants they were eating at different time periods and sub-regions in the Caribbean islands," Pagan-Jimenez wrote to Inside Science in an email.

That evidence changes the interpretation of other archaeological findings.

"It turns out that these tools that we've called manioc scrapers were not at all used for processing manioc," said Henry.

Starch grains, such as those found in cooking pots, are well-established evidence of food processing and consumption. Scientists also look for clues about food consumption in the atomic makeup of bones and tooth enamel. However, calculus allows researchers to attain a greater level of detail.

"For starch grains studies in archeology, human dental calculus is the last piece of the 'broad picture' for acquiring direct information on the whole process of plant preparation and consumption as food," said Pagan-Jimenez.

Health Hints

Dental plaque contains all manner of information about an individual's health. It can contain clues about tuberculosis, stomach ulcers and more. Since calculus is formed from plaque, it seemed natural to Warinner to investigate the preservation of health information.

"It seems like a great way to actually access so much health information about ancient peoples that otherwise has been really, really hard to do," said Warinner.

One significant modern change is a highly processed diet, which is often accompanied by fluoridated water. How does the state of modern people's mouths differ from that of their ancestors? Because calculus can preserve oral bacteria, it opens new doors to scientists.

"One of the things we don't know very well is what actually is our natural or ancestral state of health in our mouth," said Warinner. "We can look at specific dental diseases and try to understand how they have changed over time."

Warinner said that in addition to bacteria from the mouth, calculus also contains bacteria that originated in other areas of the body. These bacteria can provide more information on the array of tiny organisms that inhabit the human body, called the microbiome. Doctors are becoming increasingly aware of the relationship between this collection of flora and human health. Data gathered from genetic material found in samples such as calculus is termed metagenomic, and can greatly enhance scientists' ability to research the historical microbiome.

"[Calculus] allows us unparalleled access to these more distant organ systems that we've almost never had access to in the archaeological record except in some exceptional circumstances," said Warinner.

"The idea that metagenomic data from archaeological dental calculus can provide a glimpse of ancient human diet and health is very clever, and if validated, it will be a very exciting discovery!" wrote Cecil Lewis, a molecular anthropologist at the University of Oklahoma, in an email.

Warinner is currently studying samples from medieval Germany, in part to establish the reliability of calculus research. She's looking at pathogens, including those that cause ailments such as colds and flus. The method may allow Warinner and others to compare how certain diseases affected people throughout history and across continents.

"We could look at how their virulence has changed over time," said Warinner. "Were they more virulent in the past than today, or not?"

Clean Sample

Techniques to deduce ancient diets and disease from dental calculus are still being established and verified. Molecules of DNA in dental calculus are often degraded, and the more time has passed, the lower the chance that the sample is pristine, which makes interpretation more complicated.

Scientists are also uncertain as to how comprehensively calculus can portray diet. Not all foods that are consumed will be found in calculus. Although finding evidence that a food was in a person's mouth is significant, it doesn't necessarily explain how often the food was eaten, or what proportion of the overall diet it represented.

"We must be conscious that ancient people did not only eat starchy seeds or tubers; they also ate leaves, flowers, and so on," said Pagan-Jimenez.

"What percentage of a person's diet is represented in that record? We don't know," said Henry. "Any technique, you need to work out all the bugs before all academics buy it.

Scientists are still forming a full picture of all the components found inside ancient dental calculus, said Warinner.

Henry said she planned to examine calculus "for other kinds of plant residues or even animal food residues." She said that the technique may help solve an important mystery: when humans began cooking their food -- answers currently range from a few hundred thousand to more than 1.5 million years ago.

Both Henry and Warinner said they planned to reveal more findings, about Neanderthal diet and respiratory pathogens, respectively, in the near future.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Pedometers may help elderly move more

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Pedometers may help elderly move more
May 31st 2012, 17:20

Using a pedometer might motivate sedentary older adults to fit more walking into their daily routines, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that giving older adults a pedometer along with exercise advice seemed to work better than advice alone -- at least as far as encouraging "leisure" walking.

That refers to things like walking to the store instead of driving.

"Leisure walking is seen as a manageable form of physical activity for older adults, and hence should be more actively encouraged," said Gregory S. Kolt, a professor at the University of Western Sydney in Australia, who led the study.

Pedometers are small devices usually worn at the waist that count the number of steps the wearer takes. They can be used during one long walk or throughout the day to see how many steps are racked up.

Experts often recommend people aim to take 10,000 steps each day (a 20-minute walk would be roughly equivalent to 2,000 steps).

The reality, though, is that many of us make little use of our feet. One study found that the typical American takes just over 5,000 steps a day. People in some other countries were doing better; adults in western Australia, for example, were close to the 10,000-step goal (see Reuters story of October 14, 2010.)

But getting older adults on their feet is particularly challenging.

In New Zealand, the government funds a program called Green Prescription, where doctors "prescribe" exercise and patients get a few follow-up phone calls from an exercise counselor to see how they are doing.

For the new study, Kolt's team looked at whether adding a pedometer to the program would help older adults boost their walking even more.

The researchers randomly assigned 330 sedentary adults age 65 and up to either the standard Green Prescription program or the pedometer-based version.

People in the standard program were told to boost the amount of time they were active each day, and the pedometer group focused on steps.

After a year, participants in the pedometer group had increased their strictly leisure-time walking by 50 minutes a week, on average. That compared with a 28-minute increase in the other group, the researchers reported in the Annals of Family Medicine.

On the other hand, there was no clear difference between the two groups in overall physical activity levels -- which included walking for exercise. Older adults in both groups ended up averaging about 140 minutes of any type of walking each week.

What's more, blood pressure improved in both groups. Pedometer or not, older adults shaved around 10 points from their systolic pressure (the top number in a blood pressure reading).

So should older adults invest in a pedometer?

Kolt said the devices may be helpful for some, since they offer a way to monitor your activity levels and might motivate you to meet, or exceed, your goals.

They are also fairly cheap -- at around $20 in the U.S.

"Leisure walking is an important component of overall physical activity -- especially in older adults," Kolt told Reuters Health in an email.

So if a pedometer can encourage an older adult to do that type of walking, he said, that would be a good thing.

A caveat, though, is that people in this study were all part of a structured exercise-motivation program.

However, Kolt said, other studies have also suggested pedometers can help people boost, and maintain, their activity levels.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Dr. Manny: I support Bloomberg ban on supersize sodas

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Dr. Manny: I support Bloomberg ban on supersize sodas
May 31st 2012, 17:49

The Bloomberg administration in New York City has proposed new legislation that would ban 'super-size' sugary drinks served in cups greater than 16 ounces.

The city will be the first in the nation to impose a 16-ounce limit on the size of sweetened beverages sold in food establishments.  The ban will affect restaurants, movie theaters, stadiums and arenas, as well as mobile food carts.

Personally, I think it's about time. Despite the fact that I hate government regulating how we behave, this one makes a lot of sense to me.  For decades, the sizes of drinks and food have gotten out of proportion.

Foreigners who come as visitors are often amazed by the portions of the foods that we serve in comparison to the rest of the world.

And of course, the fault lies in ourselves, because we keep asking for more and more, and companies are more than happy to oblige and find interesting ways to sell more.  Often this involves making foods or drinks larger and even more fattening.

We've come to celebrate restaurants that glorify high-fat, nutritionally deficit foods.  Take the Heart Attack Grill in Las Vegas, for example, which features 'Triple Bypass Burgers', and has landed in the news more than once this year after customers collapsed while eating.

I'm all for a free market economy, but at what cost?  

There have been studies that have found correlations between food portion sizes and rates of obesity, blood pressure and heart disease.  A report by the CDC found portions increased 75 percent between 1977 and 1991 – unsurprisingly, we've observed huge jumps in obesity rates as well.  

Studies have shown that people with more on their plates eat nearly 50 percent more than people who are served smaller portions.

So, in this case, I'm going to support Mayor Bloomberg. I hope other states follow suit, and hopefully we will all learn that moderation of anything is part of a good lifestyle.

Don't kill the messenger.  Applaud the message.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Genetics may predict a person's success of quitting smoking

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Genetics may predict a person's success of quitting smoking
May 31st 2012, 14:03

Kicking the smoking habit may all be a matter of genetics.

New research from the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has revealed that a person's gene variations may predict whether or not they will have difficulty quitting smoking.  Published in the American Journals of Psychiatry, the study also found that those same variations are also foretelling of the person's ability to respond to nicotine-replacement drugs.

After collecting data from over 6,000 smokers who participated in scientific studies, researchers compared each participant's ability to stop smoking with genetic variations that have been found to be linked with an increased risk of smoking and nicotine dependence.

"People with the high-risk genetic markers smoked an average of two years longer than those without these high-risk genes, and they were less likely to quit smoking without medication," Dr. Li-Shiun Chen, assistant professor of psychiatry at Washington University and the study's lead author, said in a university press release. "The same gene variants can predict a person's response to smoking-cessation medication, and those with the high-risk genes are more likely to respond to the medication."

Also, those with high-risk genetic variations were three times more likely to have success with smoking-cessation drugs, such as nicotine gum or patches.

Click for more from Washington University.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Old people have distinctive smell, but it's not too bad, study finds

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Old people have distinctive smell, but it's not too bad, study finds
May 31st 2012, 13:26

The distinctive "old person smell" you may have picked up on when visiting your grandparents most likely wasn't your imagination, a new study indicates.

When given whiffs from pieces of pads worn under the armpits of young, middle-aged and elderly people for five consecutive nights, study participants could reliably distinguish the body odor of the elderly, who were 75 and older, the researchers found.

"The results of this study support the cross-culturally popular concept of an 'old person odor,'" writes the international team in a study published today (May 30) in the journal PLoS ONE.

The notion that the elderly have a distinct smell exists in multiple cultures, and usually the odor is said to be unpleasant. But this probably has more to do with negative perceptions of old age, rather than with the odor itself, according to study researcher Johan Lundström, an assistant professor at the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia.

In the study, participants rated the smell of the elderly people as less intense and less unpleasant than the body odor of young people (20 to 30 years old) and middle-aged people (45 to 55 years old). This effect was driven by how the participants rated the body odor from men, who appeared to smell the worst and the strongest in middle age. The odor from women of all ages was rated as less intense than men, and closer to neutral smelling for the young and middle-aged.

The team used young people to do the sniffing for two reasons: They were more plentiful as volunteers and using participants from different age groups could potentially introduce a new layer of complexity, if age of the smeller influences how body odor is perceived, Lundström said. 

He cautioned that while the participants did appear able to distinguish the elderly body odor, discriminating between age categories and correctly labeling odors from the elderly, they did not demonstrate a strong talent for it and showed low confidence in their abilities. [Personality Traits Affect How We Smell

It's not yet clear why body odor changes as humans age or why humans are able to pick up on these changes.

Body odors originate from an interaction between skin gland secretions and bacteria on our skin. As people age, the activity of different types of skin glands changes. This factor may contribute to the perceived change in body odor with age, the researchers write.

So far, scientists can only speculate on why this apparent signal for old age exists. Research in other animals indicates that such an odor may act as a sign of the "good genes" that have allowed a male to live into old age, making him more attractive to females. It's also possible the distinctive odor is not a direct result of age; for instance, it could be associated with increased inflammation (part of an immune response) within the bodies of the elderly, Lundström said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: New report card on family leave: Many states fail

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
New report card on family leave: Many states fail
May 31st 2012, 12:50

A new report card on the nation's family leave policies is out, and the news is grim for new parents. The report, titled Expecting Better, gives every state and the District of Columbia a grade on how well its laws and programs support new moms and dads.

Eighteen states received an F for failing to provide a single benefit or program to help support families before and after the birth, adoption or foster placement of a child. The report card was issued by the National Partnership for Women & Families, a non-profit advocacy group.

Only two states received an A-, California and Connecticut (no states scored an A). California was the first state to pass a paid family leave law, and Connecticut passed a statewide paid sick day law. Washington D.C. and New Jersey received grades of B+ because they've improved access to paid sick days and paid family leave. Hawaii, Oregon and Washington received a B for creating some family friendly policies.

Every other state fell on the bad to worse spectrum between B- and D-.

Since there are few federal laws to support new parents, state laws are critical to ensuring that new parents can take care of their newborns without risking losing their job or experiencing financial difficulties.  

"The United States lacks a national policy that provides paid family and medical leave and other support to new parents," the report stated. "And gaps in our nation's chief work and family law, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), leave millions of working parents without even unpaid job-protected leave when a new child arrives."

Only 38 percent of workers have short-term disability insurance (paid for by the employer), which provides some income during a woman's pregnancy-related disability leave. Most women can't afford to have unpaid leave. In nearly two-thirds of families, women are the primary or co-breadwinners so unpaid leave can cause financial hardship. Low wage workers are hit the hardest by the lack of family-friendly policies.

The U.S. lags behind many other countries. In comparison, 178 other countries guarantee paid leave for new mothers, and 54 nations guarantee paid leave for new fathers.

The good news is that things are better than they used to be. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (PDA) and FMLA, which entitles employees to 12 weeks of unpaid leave, have benefitted millions of new parents allowing them to hold on to their jobs while taking leave to care for a new child.

Most Americans support family friendly policies. Seventy-six percent of adults believe that businesses should be required to provide paid family and medical leave. Likewise 78 percent say that family and maternity leave is a "very important" labor standard for workers.

What does family leave entail? In New Jersey, for example, private sector workers are entitled to up to six weeks of paid family leave that can be used by either parent to care for a new child.

The benefits of taking time off after a child is born have been well documented. Studies show that mothers who don't have to rush back to work are healthier and have lower rates of post partum depression. It's also good for bonding with children.

"The first few months post-partum are an extremely important bonding time for a mom and baby," said Gina Ciagne, a certified lactation counselor for Lansinoh Laboratories. "Bonding activities like touching, cuddling and especially breastfeeding have a direct impact on a child's long-term wellbeing."

Mothers are also more likely to breastfeeding for longer, which improves the health of the child, if they take family leave. Fathers, too, develop a better, more engaged, relationship with their children when they take time off after the birth of a child.

But the benefits also extend to businesses: First-time mothers with access to paid maternity leave are more likely to return to work—for the same employer—within a year after giving birth. That saves companies huge costs associated with hiring and training new employees.

Laurie Tarkan is an award-winning health journalist whose work appears in the New York Times, among other national magazines and websites. She has authored several health books, including "Perfect Hormone Balance for Fertility." Follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: FDA rejects new name for high fructose corn syrup

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
FDA rejects new name for high fructose corn syrup
May 31st 2012, 12:43

High fructose corn syrup won't get a wholesome new name after all.

The Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday rejected the Corn Refiners Association's bid to rename its sweetening agent "corn sugar."

Given the sweetener's bad reputation in recent years, the association submitted an application to the agency in 2010 to have the product renamed on nutrition labels.

But the FDA said that it defines sugar as a solid, dried and crystallized food — not a syrup.

Separately, the Corn Refiners Association has also been running a marketing campaign to explain that its syrup is actually a form of sugar and has the same nutritional value as the familiar white, granular table sugar that consumers are familiar with.

That in turn prompted a lawsuit from the Sugar Association last year claiming that the campaign is misleading.

Dan Callister, a lawyer for the Sugar Association, said the FDA's decision confirms his group's position that sugar and high fructose corn syrup are two distinct products.

"What's going on here is basically a con game to suggest otherwise," Callister said. "What do con men do? They normally try to change their name. The FDA has thankfully stopped that."
The Corn Refiners Association issued a statement Wednesday noting that the FDA denied its petition on "narrow, technical" grounds.

The group said it stood by its claim that "the vast majority of American consumers are confused about HFCS."

High fructose corn syrup came into the U.S. market in the late 1970s and 1980s. The product is used widely in cereals, sodas and other processed food and drinks because it's cheaper and mixes easily into recipes.

Despite the name, the Corn Refiners Association says the most common forms of it are about half fructose and half glucose.

The American Medical Association has said it wants more research on high fructose corn syrup, but says there's not enough evidence to restrict its use for now. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has said that there was no evidence that the sweetener is any worse for the body than sugar — and that Americans consume too much of both of them.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Could exercise be unhealthy for some people?

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Could exercise be unhealthy for some people?
May 31st 2012, 13:36

New research suggests a radical idea – that in some cases, exercise could actually be bad for healthy people, the New York Times reported.

Using data from six exercise studies involving 1,687 people, a well-known group of researchers found 10 percent of people actually got worse on at least one of three heart disease-related measures: blood pressure, insulin levels or HDL cholesterol.  Seven percent got worse on two of the measures.

The researchers told the New York Times they didn't know why this happened, calling the results "bizarre."

While some, such as Dr. Michael Lauer, director of the Division of Cardiovascular Sciences at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, applauded the study as "interesting and well-done," others worried the study may give people another excuse not to exercise.

According to the New York Times, some critics also noted that these people who had an 'adverse' reaction to exercise did not appear to have higher rates of heart attacks or other bad outcomes. 

Click for more from the New York Times.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Body cooling treatment helps oxygen-starved newborns

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Body cooling treatment helps oxygen-starved newborns
May 31st 2012, 11:45

Babies with a life-threatening condition whose bodies are cooled shortly after birth as a treatment continue to benefit from the therapy years later, a new study suggests.

In the study of babies born with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), a condition in which the brain does not receive enough oxygen, those who received the body-cooling treatment were more likely to survive to ages 6 and 7 than those who did not receive the treatment, the study found.

In addition, the treatment did not appear to increase the risk of harms later in life — babies who received body cooling were no more likely to have physical disabilities or low IQ scores in early childhood, the researchers said.

The study supports the findings of earlier research that the cooling treatment decreased the risk of death in infants with HIE. However, it is the first study to show these benefits persist in school-age children, the researchers said.

"Before the advent of this cooling treatment in 2005, doctors couldn't treat HIE, and many infants died or sustained brain injury," said study researcher Dr. Seetha Shankaran, director of neonatal/perinatal Medicine at Wayne State University in Detroit. "It's reassuring to see that the benefits of this practice… are apparent as these children grow."

Life-threatening condition

Some infants' brains fail to get adequate oxygen either at delivery or a few hours beforehand. There are many possible causes, including rupture of the uterus and compression of the umbilical cord. As many as one in 1,000 U.S. births is affected by HIE, and in severe cases, the death rate can be 50 percent.

Hypothermia, or body cooling, was widely adopted as an HIE treatment in neonatal intensive-care units around the world after a 2005 study found it reduced infants' risk of death and disability, Shankaran said. However, it was not known whether the treatment increased the risk of memory or IQ problems, which cannot be properly tested until children are older.

In the new study, Shankaran and colleagues analyzed information from 190 children with HIE, about half of whom were treated through hypothermia within six hours of birth. The researchers followed the children until ages 6 or 7.

Of those who received the hypothermia treatment, 28 percent died before age 7, compared with 44 percent of those who did not receive the treatment.

The treatment did not increase the risk of a low IQ (a score of less than 70). Rates of cerebral palsy, blindness and epilepsy were also similar between hypothermia-treated and -untreated groups.

Body-cooling benefits

The hypothermia treatment involves placing the newborn on a special plastic blanket that contains cool, circulating water. The cool water reduces the baby's body temperature to as low as 92.3 degrees Fahrenheit (33.5 degrees Celsius. Normal body temperature is 98.6 F, or 37 C). The reduced temperature is sustained for three days, and then returned to normal.

The treatment is thought to stop or slow the detrimental processes that usually occur when the brain is deprived of oxygen, such as brain swelling and cell death, thus preventing brain injury, Shankaran said, discussing the findings at a news conference.

The study will be published in the May 31 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. It was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Pass it on:  Hypothermia treatment saves lives of infants with oxygen deprivation to the brain, and the treatment does not appear to increase the risk of cognitive impairment later in life.

 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Government expanding E. coli tests in meat

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Government expanding E. coli tests in meat
May 31st 2012, 11:48

The government is expanding E. coli testing in some raw meat, a move expected to prevent more people from contracting the bacteria that can cause severe illness or death.

The meat industry has been required for 18 years to test for just one strain of E. coli. Starting Monday, it will be required to test beef trimmings for six more strains of the pathogen that have been linked to a growing number of illnesses.

The meat industry has opposed the move, saying the tests are too expensive and there aren't enough benefits.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says the pathogens pose a threat to the nation's food supply.

Beef trimmings are parts of the cow used to make ground beef.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Frustration

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Frustration
May 31st 2012, 12:25

Once again, no chemo last week.  My white count was stubborn and did not rise high enough. I wanted to take the marrow-squeezing shot of Neulasta last week, but that would have required waiting an additional two full weeks for chemo.  I opted to take my chances and hope my white count is up to 1.5 today.  Two weeks ago, my white count was .24, last week it was 0.9 (the reason I was denied my treatment).  Your white count must be at least at 1.5 in order for your body to handle the toxicity of chemo.  

If an unthinking doctor had administered chemo to me in the past two weeks, my life would have been in jeopardy.  I can not stress enough the importance of the doctor you choose. I know not everyone has access to a major city or top university medical center, but if I had to, I would drive for hours, or go to whatever lengths necessary in order to be treated by the best physicians.

Still, I am concerned about having missed these last two chemo treatments. I will discuss it with Dr. Glaspy, but every fiber within me says I need to blast the tumors every week to beat them down.

Another of my sisters is in town to take care of me.  Incredibly, all five of my sisters have taken a week or more off from work and their busy lives to be with me, doing everything they can to make me more comfortable.  My love and thanks to Colleen, Cooper, Laura, Lucy and Bridget.  Special kudos to my loving brother Patrick, who often stops by on his way home from the office (he works on The Jimmy Kimmel Show) to bring me a shot of wheat grass.  It is truly amazing how blessed I am to be born into such a loving family!

My energy level is fairly good, as I have not had chemo for two weeks.  My sister and I have been enjoying exercising together.  Working out feels so so good, but three hours afterward, I am completely wiped-out.  Even when I adjust and do less physically, I am still exhausted.  Chemotherapy is truly a poisonous potion.  

Yet, I pray I will be allowed to have my treatment administered today.  I need four chemos  "under my belt" in order to schedule my liver scan which will determine the effectiveness of the chemotherapy

Thank you for your encouraging e-mails. I read every one and am grateful for all your good wishes. I remain as determined as ever to beat this cancer down!

Noreen Fraser is living with Stage IV metastatic breast cancer. She is co-founder of STAND UP TO CANCER and co-produced the TV show, which raised 100 million dollars for cancer research.  Noreen went on to create the Noreen Fraser Foundation to raise money and awareness for women's cancer research. The 'Men for Women Now' program enlists men to ask the women they love to make appointments for their mammogram and pap smear.  Noreen can be reached at noreen@noreenfraserfoundation.org and followed on Twitter @noreenfraser.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Study: Sleepy drivers equally as dangerous as drunken drivers

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Study: Sleepy drivers equally as dangerous as drunken drivers
May 31st 2012, 11:23

Being sleepy behind the wheel is almost as bad as drinking and driving, suggests a new study from France.

The study, published as a letter in the Archives of Internal Medicine, found that drivers who were either drunk or sleepy were at least twice as likely to be responsible for a vehicle accident compared to their well-rested or sober counterparts.

Christopher Drake, an associate scientist at the Henry Ford Hospital Sleep Disorders and Research Center in Detroit, said the findings do not change what was already known, but the study is still "interesting."

"We know from experimental studies that just four hours of sleep loss will produce as much impairment as a six pack. If you have a whole night of sleep loss, that's equivalent to having a blood alcohol content of 0.19," Drake, who was not involved with the new research, told Reuters Health.

Under the direction of Dr. Nicholas Moore at the Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux in France, researchers analyzed information from 679 drivers who were admitted to a hospital in southwest France for more than 24 hours because of a serious accident between 2007 and 2009.

The researchers used information from driver questionnaires and police reports to determine what may have contributed to the accidents. Drivers reported what medications they were on, their alcohol use and how sleepy they had been before the crash. Patient files provided information on blood alcohol levels.

The majority of the injured drivers were under 55 years old and men. Over half were on a motorcycle, about one-third of the drivers were in a car and 10 percent were peddling a bicycle at the time of the accident.

The police determined 355 of the drivers were responsible for their respective crash. From that, Moore and his colleagues found that being between the ages of 18 and 29 years old, driving a car, drinking alcohol and being sleepy were all tied to an increased risk of causing an accident.

Surprisingly, taking medications that carry warnings about affecting a driver's abilities -- one of the researchers' main focuses -- was tied to a lower risk of causing an accident.

Moore told Reuters Health that may be because people taking those medications are more aware of their side effects.

"Medicinal drugs might be an issue to keep an eye on and warn people about, but it's not the main issue," he said.

'NO SUBSTITUTE FOR SLEEP'

One way for people to reduce their accident risk is to take a nap before they hit the road, according to Moore.

"Don't hesitate if you're tired to take a short nap or drink a few cups of coffee. And if you drink coffee, it will take some time to take effect," he said.

Drake added, however, that coffee's effectiveness can wear off over time.

"Anytime you're feeling sleepy behind the wheel is a danger sign," he said.

The standard techniques of turning on the air conditioner or blasting the radio only mask the signs of sleepiness -- they don't make it go away. "They're good to get you to the next exit, but it's not going to get you home," Drake said.

There are some laws in the U.S. to punish sleepy drivers, but Drake told Reuters Health they are hard to enforce unless someone gets into an accident.

"It's very difficult. There is no breathalyzer for sleepiness," he said.

The study did have some limitations. Some of the questions are based on the patients' own reports, which may be subjective. Also, there is no way to know how many accidents sleepiness actually caused.

Overall, Moore said the best advice is, "don't drink and please sleep."

"There is no substitute for sleep," said Drake.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Tom Brady inspires man to donate kidney

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Tom Brady inspires man to donate kidney
May 31st 2012, 11:37

A recent plea from New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady inspired a Massachusetts man to donate one of his kidneys to a complete stranger.

Peter Hughes, 48, told New England Cable News he had long considered becoming an organ donor but the star quarterback's plea to help locate a kidney for his mentor, Tom Martinez, sparked Hughes to action.

Martinez died in February at age 66 after suffering a heart attack during a dialysis session. But Hughes said Brady's plea led him to MatchingDonors.com, where he discovered Ajsa Bethiel, a mother of two from war-torn Bosnia who was in desperate need of a new kidney.

After discovering he was a match, Hughes followed through and gave one of his kidneys to the woman who now resides in Lexington, Mass.

"Had it not been for that particular article, I probably wouldn't have done it," said Hughes, who was still recovering Wednesday at his home little more than a week after surgeons took his kidney.

Brady, speaking on WEEI radio in Boston Wednesday morning, praised Hughes' decision after hearing the news.

"That's pretty cool to hear," Brady said. "We worked pretty hard to help Tom, unfortunately time ran out, but I'm glad some other people really got some help."

Click for more from NECN.com. 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Hundreds of salmonella cases tied to chicks

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hundreds of salmonella cases tied to chicks
May 31st 2012, 11:34

Those cute mail-order chicks that wind up in children's Easter baskets and backyard farms have been linked to more than 300 cases of salmonella in the U.S. - mostly in youngsters - since 2004.

An estimated 50 million live poultry are sold through the mail each year in the United States in a business that has been booming because of the growing popularity of backyard chicken farming as a hobby among people who like the idea of raising their own food.

But health officials are warning of a bacterial threat on the birds' feet, feathers, beaks and eggs.

"Most people can tell you that chicken meat may have salmonella on it," said Casey Barton Behravesh of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "But surprisingly, we found many people are not aware that live chicks and chickens can spread salmonella to people."

Since 2004, at least 316 people in 43 states got sick in an outbreak tied primarily to one mail-order hatchery. Health officials believe thousands more illnesses connected to the business were probably never reported.

No one died, but three dozen people were hospitalized with bloody diarrhea or other symptoms. The illnesses were detailed Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Salmonella can cause diarrhea, fever and stomach pain but is rarely fatal. It is most dangerous to very young children, the elderly and people with weakened immune systems. The infection is usually contracted from food, but live animals can transmit it, too, because the bacteria can be in their feces.

Salmonella outbreaks have been linked to hatcheries for more than 50 years. And health officials have long warned that people can get salmonella from touching chickens - especially children, who tend to put their fingers in their mouths. Indeed, the CDC says children under 5 shouldn't be allowed to touch chickens at all.

Health officials also advise people not to bring birds into their homes and to wash their hands thoroughly after handling live poultry.

About 20 hatcheries mail live chicks overnight in the U.S., supplying not only feed stores and farms but amateurs with backyard coops. The mail-order houses have been seeing record sales in recent years.

"It's all part of this greener, healthier lifestyle," said Behravesh, a veterinary epidemiologist.

Jonah McDonald, a 32-year-old Atlanta man who keeps three hens and insists a backyard egg tastes better, said he does not know of anyone who has gotten salmonella from handling chickens.

"The kids in my neighborhood come over and feed scraps to my chickens," he said. "It's a real community thing."

The CDC described an eight-year investigation into salmonella illnesses, with more than 80 percent of the cases tied to a single hatchery in the western U.S. While CDC officials refused to identify the business, a previous report on the investigation by the health agency indicated it is in New Mexico.

Investigators interviewed victims and concluded many had caught salmonella from touching chicks or ducklings, often at home. From there, most of the illnesses were traced to the hatchery.

Behravesh said the hatchery has taken steps to curb the spread of salmonella - including replacing equipment, adopting new egg-cleaning procedures and vaccinating chickens - and is not considered a health threat. She said she was not aware of any fines or penalties against the business over the outbreak.

During the eight years studied, the annual number of illnesses linked to the hatchery ranged as high as 84, with 29 cases last year and only one so far in 2012.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Fatty acids in formula don't make babies smarter

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Fatty acids in formula don't make babies smarter
May 31st 2012, 11:28

Baby formula that is supplemented with fatty acids in an attempt to mimic breast milk doesn't boost infants' brainpower any more than formula without extra fatty acids, according to a new review of several studies.

The results don't necessarily mean fatty acids in formula have no benefit. But they suggest the fats don't give children the thinking and language advantage that's been tied to breastfeeding.

Researchers explain in their study, published in the journal Pediatrics, that infants raised on breast milk tend to score higher on tests of mental development than those who are fed formula.

One reason for the gap could be the higher levels of fatty acids found in breast milk, given that the fats are essential for babies' brain development.

"The differences in cognitive development between breastfed and formula-fed infants were a substantial motivating factor in adding (fatty acids) to infant formulas," according to the report.

Most baby formula is cow's milk-based and fortified with fatty acids and other nutrients.

Formula supplemented with two fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AA), has been available in the United States since 2002.

Although fatty acids are important for brain development, it's not clear adding them to infants' diets will improve their mental skills.

Studies on the issue have had mixed results, so the researchers, led by Dr. Ahmad Qawasmi at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut and Al-Quds University in Jerusalem, sought to get a better verdict by combining them into one analysis.

They used data from 12 trials that compared babies fed formula with fatty acid supplementation to babies fed formula without the extra fats. In total, about 1,800 infants took part in the studies, which were conducted between 1998 and 2005.

The children started drinking formula by one month of age, and around the time they turned one, they underwent exams to measure their motor skills, language abilities and mental development.

Just two of the studies included in the analysis found that babies fed supplemented formula performed better on the tests.

A third report showed a fatty acid-linked boost on some developmental measures but not others, and the remaining nine studies found no cognitive benefits in the babies getting added fatty acids.

Taken together, the studies show the extra fats provide no advantage as far as braininess goes, the researchers said. But it's still possible that adding fatty acids to formula could benefit infants in other ways, such as with a boost in eyesight or immune function, they noted.

"There also remains the possibility that (fatty acids) could impact later cognitive development or more specific aspects of cognitive development such as attention, information processing, mood, or behavior."

Public health organizations and medical societies consider breast milk to be the best food source for babies.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends women breastfeed exclusively for six months, followed by at least another six months of nursing while solid foods are introduced.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Girls' food choices at age 9 may predict future eating disorders

FOXNews.com
FOX News Network - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Girls' food choices at age 9 may predict future eating disorders
May 31st 2012, 11:41

The foods girls chose to eat when they're younger may indicate their risk of having an eating disorder in their teens, a new study suggests.

In the study, girls whose diets at age 11 included a low percentage of calories from fat, and high percentage from carbohydrates were at increased risk of developing eating disorder symptoms, such as body dissatisfaction, at age 14, and erratic eating patterns in their later teens, the researchers said.

The findings suggest that examining young children's diets may be a way to screen for risky eating patterns and catch problems before they develop into full-blown eating disorders, which are harder to treat, said study researcher Abbigail Tissot, associate director of the Division of Behavioral Medicine at Cincinnati Children's Hospital.

"We might be able to catch some of these behaviors that are just blossoming," Tissot said.

Although eating disorders tend to be associated with life-threatening thinness, such screening could prevent obesity as well, Tissot said. Some girls in the study who were preoccupied with dieting and thinness when they were younger actually went on to overeat when they were older, perhaps because they went so long without listening to their bodies' natural hunger cues, Tissot said.

"When you don't listen to those hormones, those signals, they sort of stop communicating with you," Tissot said. If children don't listen to their bodies, "they probably will end up not knowing how to eat properly," when they're older, she said.

Predicting eating disorders

Tissot and colleagues analyzed information from 871 girls, ages 9 to 10, who were tracked the for 10 years. Each year, a dietician interviewed the girls about what they ate over a three-day period, with input from the parents to help determine exact quantities. The girls also filled out questionnaires to assess their eating disorder symptoms.

Results showed a link between eating patterns in girls as young as age 9 and eating disorder symptoms later in life. Nine-year-olds whose diets included a high percentage of protein and a relatively low percentage of carbs were at increased risk for a desire to be thin at ages 11 to 12, the researchers said.

The findings also suggested that eating-disorder behaviors develop along a trajectory, starting with a desire to be thin around ages 9 to 12, which develops into body dissatisfaction around age 14 and erratic eating behavior at ages 18 to 19. Erratic eating behavior refers to inconsistent eating patterns, such as undereating followed by overeating.

Diagnosing at a young age

Information for the study was collected quite a while ago, between 1988 and 1999, the researchers noted. Since then, doctors have seen an increase in eating disorders in girls younger than 11.

That means that it's possible eating disorder signs now show up even earlier than they did in the girls in the study, perhaps around age 7, Tissot said. However, more research is needed to confirm this.

The study was presented at the International Conference on Eating Disorders, held May 3 to 5 in Austin, Texas, and has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. It was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Pass it on: The variety of foods eaten at ages 9 to 11 may predict the development of eating disorder symptoms later in life in girls.

 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.